Com Pac Hutchins COM PAC 23 IV SL vs Scarab 165 ID Premium Sound Pkg: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Com Pac Hutchins COM PAC 23 IV SL holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Com Pac Hutchins COM PAC 23 IV SL comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Scarab 165 ID Premium Sound Pkg. Over the first five years the Com Pac Hutchins COM PAC 23 IV SL loses roughly $18,161 while the Scarab 165 ID Premium Sound Pkg loses about $12,628 — a gap near $-5533.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Com Pac Hutchins COM PAC 23 IV SL sheds about 10% in year one versus 10% for the Scarab 165 ID Premium Sound Pkg. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…