Cougar Bay Drifter 180 Z CC vs Lowe SS270 Extended WLK THR: 5-year value retention (59% vs 59%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Cougar Bay Drifter 180 Z CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Cougar Bay Drifter 180 Z CC comes out ahead, holding about 59% of its value versus 59% for the Lowe SS270 Extended WLK THR. Over the first five years the Cougar Bay Drifter 180 Z CC loses roughly $12,844 while the Lowe SS270 Extended WLK THR loses about $30,048 — a gap near $17,204.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Cougar Bay Drifter 180 Z CC sheds about 10% in year one versus 16% for the Lowe SS270 Extended WLK THR. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…