Cougar Challenger 160 Bay CC vs Xtreme 1754 CC 0 125 Bottom: 5-year value retention (54% vs 54%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Xtreme 1754 CC 0 125 Bottom holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Xtreme 1754 CC 0 125 Bottom comes out ahead, holding about 54% of its value versus 54% for the Cougar Challenger 160 Bay CC. Over the first five years the Xtreme 1754 CC 0 125 Bottom loses roughly $7,538 while the Cougar Challenger 160 Bay CC loses about $13,171 — a gap near $5,633.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Xtreme 1754 CC 0 125 Bottom sheds about 16% in year one versus 12% for the Cougar Challenger 160 Bay CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…