Crest 240 L vs Sylvan M3 CRS — Depreciation Comparison

Crest 240 L vs Sylvan M3 CRS: 5-year value retention (66% vs 66%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Crest 240 L holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Crest 240 L comes out ahead, holding about 66% of its value versus 66% for the Sylvan M3 CRS. Over the first five years the Crest 240 L loses roughly $16,824 while the Sylvan M3 CRS loses about $37,540 — a gap near $20,716.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Crest 240 L sheds about 17% in year one versus 9% for the Sylvan M3 CRS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…