Crestliner 1600 Vision vs Lund 1648 M: 5-year value retention (66% vs 66%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Crestliner 1600 Vision holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Crestliner 1600 Vision comes out ahead, holding about 66% of its value versus 66% for the Lund 1648 M. Over the first five years the Crestliner 1600 Vision loses roughly $7,397 while the Lund 1648 M loses about $1,749 — a gap near $-5648.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Crestliner 1600 Vision sheds about 10% in year one versus 22% for the Lund 1648 M. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…