Defiance 210 Catalina CC vs Lowe FM 1675 SC — Depreciation Comparison

Defiance 210 Catalina CC vs Lowe FM 1675 SC: 5-year value retention (66% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe FM 1675 SC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Lowe FM 1675 SC comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 66% for the Defiance 210 Catalina CC. Over the first five years the Lowe FM 1675 SC loses roughly $7,723 while the Defiance 210 Catalina CC loses about $18,588 — a gap near $10,865.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe FM 1675 SC sheds about 15% in year one versus 9% for the Defiance 210 Catalina CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…