Dusky 252 Twin Rigging CC vs RH Aluminum 24 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL — Depreciation Comparison

Dusky 252 Twin Rigging CC vs RH Aluminum 24 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL: 5-year value retention (73% vs 73%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Dusky 252 Twin Rigging CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Dusky 252 Twin Rigging CC comes out ahead, holding about 73% of its value versus 73% for the RH Aluminum 24 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL. Over the first five years the Dusky 252 Twin Rigging CC loses roughly $15,827 while the RH Aluminum 24 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL loses about $27,565 — a gap near $11,738.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Dusky 252 Twin Rigging CC sheds about 21% in year one versus 8% for the RH Aluminum 24 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…