East Cape Skiffs Bay FO vs Sportsman Masters 267 CC — Depreciation Comparison

East Cape Skiffs Bay FO vs Sportsman Masters 267 CC: 5-year value retention (63% vs 63%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. East Cape Skiffs Bay FO holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the East Cape Skiffs Bay FO comes out ahead, holding about 63% of its value versus 63% for the Sportsman Masters 267 CC. Over the first five years the East Cape Skiffs Bay FO loses roughly $62,697 while the Sportsman Masters 267 CC loses about $81,075 — a gap near $18,378.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the East Cape Skiffs Bay FO sheds about 11% in year one versus 33% for the Sportsman Masters 267 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…