Ember 201FBQ vs Ice Castle Fish Houses 8X16 Mille Lacs Hybrid — Depreciation Comparison

Ember 201FBQ vs Ice Castle Fish Houses 8X16 Mille Lacs Hybrid: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ember 201FBQ holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Ember 201FBQ comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Ice Castle Fish Houses 8X16 Mille Lacs Hybrid. Over the first five years the Ember 201FBQ loses roughly $19,038 while the Ice Castle Fish Houses 8X16 Mille Lacs Hybrid loses about $9,745 — a gap near $-9293.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ember 201FBQ sheds about 18% in year one versus 6% for the Ice Castle Fish Houses 8X16 Mille Lacs Hybrid. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…