Everglades 273 CC vs Kingfisher 2175 Extreme Shallow: 5-year value retention (64% vs 64%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Everglades 273 CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Everglades 273 CC comes out ahead, holding about 64% of its value versus 64% for the Kingfisher 2175 Extreme Shallow. Over the first five years the Everglades 273 CC loses roughly $112,004 while the Kingfisher 2175 Extreme Shallow loses about $26,882 — a gap near $-85122.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Everglades 273 CC sheds about 16% in year one versus 8% for the Kingfisher 2175 Extreme Shallow. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…