Aluma Weld Xpress HD16DDP vs Falcon Bass F185 — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress HD16DDP vs Falcon Bass F185: 5-year value retention (61% vs 61%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress HD16DDP holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress HD16DDP comes out ahead, holding about 61% of its value versus 61% for the Falcon Bass F185. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress HD16DDP loses roughly $3,481 while the Falcon Bass F185 loses about $27,607 — a gap near $24,126.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress HD16DDP sheds about 10% in year one versus 27% for the Falcon Bass F185. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…