Flagstaff By Forest River 228D vs Nash 24M — Depreciation Comparison

Flagstaff By Forest River 228D vs Nash 24M: 5-year value retention (59% vs 59%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Flagstaff By Forest River 228D holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Flagstaff By Forest River 228D comes out ahead, holding about 59% of its value versus 59% for the Nash 24M. Over the first five years the Flagstaff By Forest River 228D loses roughly $9,391 while the Nash 24M loses about $23,156 — a gap near $13,765.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Flagstaff By Forest River 228D sheds about 10% in year one versus 28% for the Nash 24M. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…