Flagstaff By Forest River 29RLBS vs Nash 23D — Depreciation Comparison

Flagstaff By Forest River 29RLBS vs Nash 23D: 5-year value retention (59% vs 59%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Flagstaff By Forest River 29RLBS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Flagstaff By Forest River 29RLBS comes out ahead, holding about 59% of its value versus 59% for the Nash 23D. Over the first five years the Flagstaff By Forest River 29RLBS loses roughly $28,088 while the Nash 23D loses about $24,995 — a gap near $-3093.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Flagstaff By Forest River 29RLBS sheds about 19% in year one versus 34% for the Nash 23D. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…