G3 1652WOF vs Scout 420 LXF CCC — Depreciation Comparison

G3 1652WOF vs Scout 420 LXF CCC: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. G3 1652WOF holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the G3 1652WOF comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the Scout 420 LXF CCC. Over the first five years the G3 1652WOF loses roughly $6,964 while the Scout 420 LXF CCC loses about $363,330 — a gap near $356,366.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the G3 1652WOF sheds about 11% in year one versus 6% for the Scout 420 LXF CCC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…