G3 18 SC Camo vs SeaArk RXJT170 CC — Depreciation Comparison

G3 18 SC Camo vs SeaArk RXJT170 CC: 5-year value retention (75% vs 75%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. G3 18 SC Camo holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the G3 18 SC Camo comes out ahead, holding about 75% of its value versus 75% for the SeaArk RXJT170 CC. Over the first five years the G3 18 SC Camo loses roughly $8,680 while the SeaArk RXJT170 CC loses about $3,300 — a gap near $-5380.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the G3 18 SC Camo sheds about 11% in year one versus 8% for the SeaArk RXJT170 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…