G3 1852WSOF vs Lund 202 Pro V GL: 5-year value retention (71% vs 71%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. G3 1852WSOF holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the G3 1852WSOF comes out ahead, holding about 71% of its value versus 71% for the Lund 202 Pro V GL. Over the first five years the G3 1852WSOF loses roughly $2,139 while the Lund 202 Pro V GL loses about $35,011 — a gap near $32,872.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the G3 1852WSOF sheds about 12% in year one versus 22% for the Lund 202 Pro V GL. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…