G3 Sportsman 2100 Camo vs Lowe 1860 Rambler — Depreciation Comparison

G3 Sportsman 2100 Camo vs Lowe 1860 Rambler: 5-year value retention (74% vs 74%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. G3 Sportsman 2100 Camo holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the G3 Sportsman 2100 Camo comes out ahead, holding about 74% of its value versus 74% for the Lowe 1860 Rambler. Over the first five years the G3 Sportsman 2100 Camo loses roughly $18,242 while the Lowe 1860 Rambler loses about $6,801 — a gap near $-11441.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the G3 Sportsman 2100 Camo sheds about 12% in year one versus 15% for the Lowe 1860 Rambler. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…