Glasstream 260 TE vs Nautic Star 203 SC Sport Deck DB — Depreciation Comparison

Glasstream 260 TE vs Nautic Star 203 SC Sport Deck DB: 5-year value retention (77% vs 77%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Glasstream 260 TE holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Glasstream 260 TE comes out ahead, holding about 77% of its value versus 77% for the Nautic Star 203 SC Sport Deck DB. Over the first five years the Glasstream 260 TE loses roughly $18,169 while the Nautic Star 203 SC Sport Deck DB loses about $10,511 — a gap near $-7658.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Glasstream 260 TE sheds about 5% in year one versus 5% for the Nautic Star 203 SC Sport Deck DB. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…