Coleman By Dutchmen 264RL vs Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 29G: 5-year value retention (51% vs 51%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Coleman By Dutchmen 264RL holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Coleman By Dutchmen 264RL comes out ahead, holding about 51% of its value versus 51% for the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 29G. Over the first five years the Coleman By Dutchmen 264RL loses roughly $17,784 while the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 29G loses about $39,857 — a gap near $22,073.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Coleman By Dutchmen 264RL sheds about 14% in year one versus 17% for the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 29G. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…