Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 320G vs Venom By Kz 3916TK: 5-year value retention (52% vs 52%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 320G holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 320G comes out ahead, holding about 52% of its value versus 52% for the Venom By Kz 3916TK. Over the first five years the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 320G loses roughly $57,054 while the Venom By Kz 3916TK loses about $71,455 — a gap near $14,401.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 320G sheds about 28% in year one versus 16% for the Venom By Kz 3916TK. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…