Flagstaff By Forest River 206LTD vs Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 398M: 5-year value retention (52% vs 52%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Flagstaff By Forest River 206LTD holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Flagstaff By Forest River 206LTD comes out ahead, holding about 52% of its value versus 52% for the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 398M. Over the first five years the Flagstaff By Forest River 206LTD loses roughly $7,885 while the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 398M loses about $73,531 — a gap near $65,646.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Flagstaff By Forest River 206LTD sheds about 11% in year one versus 20% for the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 398M. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…