H2O Sports 17 DF CC vs Lowe 1760 SC — Depreciation Comparison

H2O Sports 17 DF CC vs Lowe 1760 SC: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. H2O Sports 17 DF CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the H2O Sports 17 DF CC comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Lowe 1760 SC. Over the first five years the H2O Sports 17 DF CC loses roughly $3,626 while the Lowe 1760 SC loses about $7,842 — a gap near $4,216.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the H2O Sports 17 DF CC sheds about 6% in year one versus 17% for the Lowe 1760 SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…