H2O Sports 2000 CC vs Lund 2000 Alaskan: 5-year value retention (74% vs 73%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. H2O Sports 2000 CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the H2O Sports 2000 CC comes out ahead, holding about 74% of its value versus 73% for the Lund 2000 Alaskan. Over the first five years the H2O Sports 2000 CC loses roughly $5,764 while the Lund 2000 Alaskan loses about $11,785 — a gap near $6,021.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the H2O Sports 2000 CC sheds about 5% in year one versus 9% for the Lund 2000 Alaskan. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…