Havoc 1656 MST vs Lowe 1860 Deluxe Tiller: 5-year value retention (83% vs 83%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Havoc 1656 MST holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Havoc 1656 MST comes out ahead, holding about 83% of its value versus 83% for the Lowe 1860 Deluxe Tiller. Over the first five years the Havoc 1656 MST loses roughly $1,166 while the Lowe 1860 Deluxe Tiller loses about $3,420 — a gap near $2,254.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Havoc 1656 MST sheds about 3% in year one versus 12% for the Lowe 1860 Deluxe Tiller. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…