Kawasaki STX 160LX vs Starcraft 16 Spark SC — Depreciation Comparison

Kawasaki STX 160LX vs Starcraft 16 Spark SC: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Kawasaki STX 160LX holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Kawasaki STX 160LX comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Starcraft 16 Spark SC. Over the first five years the Kawasaki STX 160LX loses roughly $5,136 while the Starcraft 16 Spark SC loses about $5,012 — a gap near $-124.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Kawasaki STX 160LX sheds about 16% in year one versus 24% for the Starcraft 16 Spark SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…