Ember 171FB vs Keystone Rv 1700 FQ: 5-year value retention (64% vs 64%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ember 171FB holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Ember 171FB comes out ahead, holding about 64% of its value versus 64% for the Keystone Rv 1700 FQ. Over the first five years the Ember 171FB loses roughly $23,592 while the Keystone Rv 1700 FQ loses about $10,509 — a gap near $-13083.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ember 171FB sheds about 11% in year one versus 28% for the Keystone Rv 1700 FQ. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…