Keystone Rv 202 RD vs Starcraft 212FB — Depreciation Comparison

Keystone Rv 202 RD vs Starcraft 212FB: 5-year value retention (49% vs 49%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Keystone Rv 202 RD holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Keystone Rv 202 RD comes out ahead, holding about 49% of its value versus 49% for the Starcraft 212FB. Over the first five years the Keystone Rv 202 RD loses roughly $18,717 while the Starcraft 212FB loses about $20,756 — a gap near $2,039.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Keystone Rv 202 RD sheds about 14% in year one versus 23% for the Starcraft 212FB. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…