Crossroads Rv 298 FB vs Keystone Rv 29 DFS — Depreciation Comparison

Crossroads Rv 298 FB vs Keystone Rv 29 DFS: 5-year value retention (49% vs 49%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Crossroads Rv 298 FB holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Crossroads Rv 298 FB comes out ahead, holding about 49% of its value versus 49% for the Keystone Rv 29 DFS. Over the first five years the Crossroads Rv 298 FB loses roughly $25,084 while the Keystone Rv 29 DFS loses about $25,115 — a gap near $31.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Crossroads Rv 298 FB sheds about 19% in year one versus 14% for the Keystone Rv 29 DFS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…