Keystone Rv 39 Mbnk vs Keystone Rv 39 Rden — Depreciation Comparison

Keystone Rv 39 Mbnk vs Keystone Rv 39 Rden: 5-year value retention (59% vs 59%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Keystone Rv 39 Mbnk holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Keystone Rv 39 Mbnk comes out ahead, holding about 59% of its value versus 59% for the Keystone Rv 39 Rden. Over the first five years the Keystone Rv 39 Mbnk loses roughly $34,263 while the Keystone Rv 39 Rden loses about $37,743 — a gap near $3,480.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Keystone Rv 39 Mbnk sheds about 18% in year one versus 27% for the Keystone Rv 39 Rden. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…