Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty vs Mako 214 CC: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Mako 214 CC. Over the first five years the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty loses roughly $19,677 while the Mako 214 CC loses about $23,212 — a gap near $3,535.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty sheds about 8% in year one versus 20% for the Mako 214 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…