Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty vs Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow — Depreciation Comparison

Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty vs Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow. Over the first five years the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty loses roughly $19,677 while the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow loses about $16,111 — a gap near $-3566.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty sheds about 8% in year one versus 9% for the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…