Kingfisher 2025 Falcon vs Lowe FM 1800 WT: 5-year value retention (77% vs 77%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Kingfisher 2025 Falcon holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Kingfisher 2025 Falcon comes out ahead, holding about 77% of its value versus 77% for the Lowe FM 1800 WT. Over the first five years the Kingfisher 2025 Falcon loses roughly $8,482 while the Lowe FM 1800 WT loses about $9,027 — a gap near $545.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Kingfisher 2025 Falcon sheds about 16% in year one versus 15% for the Lowe FM 1800 WT. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…