Kingfisher 3425 GFX PH vs Lowe FS 1800 — Depreciation Comparison

Kingfisher 3425 GFX PH vs Lowe FS 1800: 5-year value retention (77% vs 77%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Kingfisher 3425 GFX PH holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Kingfisher 3425 GFX PH comes out ahead, holding about 77% of its value versus 77% for the Lowe FS 1800. Over the first five years the Kingfisher 3425 GFX PH loses roughly $72,080 while the Lowe FS 1800 loses about $7,952 — a gap near $-64128.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Kingfisher 3425 GFX PH sheds about 17% in year one versus 14% for the Lowe FS 1800. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…