Kropf 4720 Rear Loft vs Kropf 6128 Rear Loft: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Kropf 4720 Rear Loft holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Kropf 4720 Rear Loft comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Kropf 6128 Rear Loft. Over the first five years the Kropf 4720 Rear Loft loses roughly $27,857 while the Kropf 6128 Rear Loft loses about $27,857 — a gap near $0.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Kropf 4720 Rear Loft sheds about 10% in year one versus 10% for the Kropf 6128 Rear Loft. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…