Kropf 8033 vs Viking By Forest River 17SFQ — Depreciation Comparison

Kropf 8033 vs Viking By Forest River 17SFQ: 5-year value retention (63% vs 63%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Kropf 8033 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Kropf 8033 comes out ahead, holding about 63% of its value versus 63% for the Viking By Forest River 17SFQ. Over the first five years the Kropf 8033 loses roughly $28,072 while the Viking By Forest River 17SFQ loses about $7,737 — a gap near $-20335.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Kropf 8033 sheds about 10% in year one versus 23% for the Viking By Forest River 17SFQ. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…