KTM 1290 Super DUKE GT vs KTM 300 XC — Depreciation Comparison

KTM 1290 Super DUKE GT vs KTM 300 XC: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. KTM 1290 Super DUKE GT holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the KTM 1290 Super DUKE GT comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the KTM 300 XC. Over the first five years the KTM 1290 Super DUKE GT loses roughly $6,417 while the KTM 300 XC loses about $3,611 — a gap near $-2806.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the KTM 1290 Super DUKE GT sheds about 11% in year one versus 6% for the KTM 300 XC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…