Keystone Rv 351 vs Lance Lance 960 — Depreciation Comparison

Keystone Rv 351 vs Lance Lance 960: 5-year value retention (46% vs 46%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Keystone Rv 351 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Keystone Rv 351 comes out ahead, holding about 46% of its value versus 46% for the Lance Lance 960. Over the first five years the Keystone Rv 351 loses roughly $69,158 while the Lance Lance 960 loses about $30,776 — a gap near $-38382.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Keystone Rv 351 sheds about 21% in year one versus 18% for the Lance Lance 960. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…