Crest 220 SF vs Landau 240 Rear Deck 3: 5-year value retention (62% vs 62%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Crest 220 SF holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Crest 220 SF comes out ahead, holding about 62% of its value versus 62% for the Landau 240 Rear Deck 3. Over the first five years the Crest 220 SF loses roughly $15,415 while the Landau 240 Rear Deck 3 loses about $17,316 — a gap near $1,901.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Crest 220 SF sheds about 17% in year one versus 17% for the Landau 240 Rear Deck 3. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…