Lowe 160 Cruise vs Shearwater X 22 Hybrid CC: 5-year value retention (61% vs 61%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe 160 Cruise holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe 160 Cruise comes out ahead, holding about 61% of its value versus 61% for the Shearwater X 22 Hybrid CC. Over the first five years the Lowe 160 Cruise loses roughly $7,506 while the Shearwater X 22 Hybrid CC loses about $71,576 — a gap near $64,070.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe 160 Cruise sheds about 17% in year one versus 30% for the Shearwater X 22 Hybrid CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…