Lowe FM 1625 WT vs Lowe Skorpion Stick Steer — Depreciation Comparison

Lowe FM 1625 WT vs Lowe Skorpion Stick Steer: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe FM 1625 WT holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Lowe FM 1625 WT comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Lowe Skorpion Stick Steer. Over the first five years the Lowe FM 1625 WT loses roughly $7,527 while the Lowe Skorpion Stick Steer loses about $6,714 — a gap near $-813.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe FM 1625 WT sheds about 15% in year one versus 14% for the Lowe Skorpion Stick Steer. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…