Lowe FM 1675 WT vs Mitzi Skiffs 15 Tiller FO: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe FM 1675 WT holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe FM 1675 WT comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the Mitzi Skiffs 15 Tiller FO. Over the first five years the Lowe FM 1675 WT loses roughly $8,724 while the Mitzi Skiffs 15 Tiller FO loses about $4,581 — a gap near $-4143.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe FM 1675 WT sheds about 15% in year one versus 23% for the Mitzi Skiffs 15 Tiller FO. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…