Lowe FM 1775 WT vs Tracker Grizzly 1754 SC: 5-year value retention (72% vs 72%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe FM 1775 WT holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe FM 1775 WT comes out ahead, holding about 72% of its value versus 72% for the Tracker Grizzly 1754 SC. Over the first five years the Lowe FM 1775 WT loses roughly $8,718 while the Tracker Grizzly 1754 SC loses about $5,679 — a gap near $-3039.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe FM 1775 WT sheds about 14% in year one versus 16% for the Tracker Grizzly 1754 SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…