Lowe Skorpion 17 vs Lund 189 Tyee GL: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe Skorpion 17 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe Skorpion 17 comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the Lund 189 Tyee GL. Over the first five years the Lowe Skorpion 17 loses roughly $6,784 while the Lund 189 Tyee GL loses about $29,172 — a gap near $22,388.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe Skorpion 17 sheds about 14% in year one versus 20% for the Lund 189 Tyee GL. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…