Lowe Stinger 198 vs Ranger 2050MS — Depreciation Comparison

Lowe Stinger 198 vs Ranger 2050MS: 5-year value retention (78% vs 78%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe Stinger 198 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Lowe Stinger 198 comes out ahead, holding about 78% of its value versus 78% for the Ranger 2050MS. Over the first five years the Lowe Stinger 198 loses roughly $10,235 while the Ranger 2050MS loses about $20,052 — a gap near $9,817.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe Stinger 198 sheds about 13% in year one versus 16% for the Ranger 2050MS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…