Lowe WV1670 vs Lund 2075 Pro V Sport: 5-year value retention (71% vs 71%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe WV1670 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe WV1670 comes out ahead, holding about 71% of its value versus 71% for the Lund 2075 Pro V Sport. Over the first five years the Lowe WV1670 loses roughly $1,739 while the Lund 2075 Pro V Sport loses about $34,211 — a gap near $32,472.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe WV1670 sheds about 18% in year one versus 22% for the Lund 2075 Pro V Sport. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…