Lund 1600 Fury SS vs Mako Pro Skiff 15 CC: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1600 Fury SS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1600 Fury SS comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Mako Pro Skiff 15 CC. Over the first five years the Lund 1600 Fury SS loses roughly $7,137 while the Mako Pro Skiff 15 CC loses about $7,433 — a gap near $296.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1600 Fury SS sheds about 24% in year one versus 18% for the Mako Pro Skiff 15 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…