Lund 1625 Fury XL SS vs SeaArk RXJT160 SC — Depreciation Comparison

Lund 1625 Fury XL SS vs SeaArk RXJT160 SC: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1625 Fury XL SS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Lund 1625 Fury XL SS comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the SeaArk RXJT160 SC. Over the first five years the Lund 1625 Fury XL SS loses roughly $4,921 while the SeaArk RXJT160 SC loses about $2,543 — a gap near $-2378.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1625 Fury XL SS sheds about 5% in year one versus 8% for the SeaArk RXJT160 SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…