Alweld 1652 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg vs Lund 1625 Fury XL: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1652 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alweld 1652 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the Lund 1625 Fury XL. Over the first five years the Alweld 1652 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg loses roughly $1,578 while the Lund 1625 Fury XL loses about $4,287 — a gap near $2,709.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1652 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg sheds about 5% in year one versus 5% for the Lund 1625 Fury XL. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…