Lund 1650 Angler Tiller vs Mako 414 CC: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1650 Angler Tiller holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1650 Angler Tiller comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Mako 414 CC. Over the first five years the Lund 1650 Angler Tiller loses roughly $8,720 while the Mako 414 CC loses about $201,722 — a gap near $193,002.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1650 Angler Tiller sheds about 23% in year one versus 8% for the Mako 414 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…