Aluma Weld Xpress SW22B Xtrm Marsh PK BS vs Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress SW22B Xtrm Marsh PK BS vs Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress SW22B Xtrm Marsh PK BS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress SW22B Xtrm Marsh PK BS comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress SW22B Xtrm Marsh PK BS loses roughly $14,534 while the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport loses about $11,104 — a gap near $-3430.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress SW22B Xtrm Marsh PK BS sheds about 23% in year one versus 24% for the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…